TI-30XS MultiView Road test

Casio introduced with the fx-115ES already in 2005 an advanced scientific calculator with a 2-line Natural Textbook Display showing formulas and results exactly as they appear in the textbook. Texas Instruments followed mid-2007 with the TI-30XS MultiView and Sharp joined the group with its EL-W531 series introduced late-2007.

Comparing calculators seems to be pretty easy but aside from technical features there are a lot of subjective aspects like ergonomics or font of the display. For this overview we acquired in February 2008 three popular scientific calculators:

Package

All three calculators arrived in the typical blister package and included a sliding or snap-on cover and a manual.

Manual

The TI-30XS MultiView gave the best impression with its easy readable, bound manual instead of the common small-printed and folded manuals of the competitors.

Design

Both the fx-300ES and the EL-W535 sport a similar, nice designed housing. They fit easily into the palm, feel comfortable light and have a very good plastics surface finish. The TI-30XS MultiView is significant larger and heavier but sits better on the table.

Both the fx-300ES and the EL-W535 continue the traditional Casio and Sharp design line and look rather old-fashioned compared with the radical design of the Texas Instruments TI-30XS MultiView.

Keyboard

Despite the fact that all three calculators were manufactured in China, there are huge differences between the individual keyboards. While the keys of the fx-300ES and TI-30XS MultiView are firm and responsive with a convenient travel are we disappointed by the Sharp EL-W535 keyboard. The keys lack any resistance and due to the short stroke they miss any tactile feedback.

Lettering

The chromatics of the EL-W535 is rather flashy but we like the strong orange on the black background with the large font. Next comes the fx-300ES with less contrast for the 2nd and 3rd functions and a smaller font. The lettering of the TI-30XS MultiView is borderline because of the weak contrast between the green 2nd functions and the blue background. Nevertheless are the keys best arranged and miss any 3rd functions. 

Display

All three displays sports almost identical size and resolution but both the EL-W535 and TI-30XS MultiView display 4-lines while the fx-300ES displays just 3-lines on it. As a matter of fact are the characters noticeable larger on the fx-300ES and we like the 9*5 pixel font instead of the usual 7*5 pixel design. The contrast and reading angles of the three displays are almost identical, but the glossy display bezel of the EL-W535 is a real show stopper.

Power Supply

The three selected calculators are available with batteries only or additional solar cells. Both the fx-300ES and EL-W535 make use of a small, easy accessible LR44 alkali battery, while the TI-30XS MultiView makes use of a large CR-2032 lithium coin cell which is difficult to replace.

Quality

Disassembly of all three calculators is very easy. The back is held on with 6 or 7 screws and could be lifted out easily. The internal construction is fairly similar and state of the art with a single-chip calculator circuit attached directly to the printed circuit board (PCB) and protected with a small blob of black epoxy. The display is connected to the PCB with a heat seal conductor. The TI-30XS MultiView purchased for this road test was manufactured by Kinpo using a second, low-tech PCB for the keyboard. The PCB’s of the different calculators are hold in place by either screws or fastened by heat stakes.

Overall the TI-30XS MultiView demonstrates tank built quality while the two competitors are rather average engineered.

Functions

Please refer to table below.

Precision

The embedded algorithm of the calculators and the internal representation of the numbers specify the precision of the calculations. The three competitors use for the internal calculations 13 digits (TI-30XS MultiView), 14 digits (EL-W535), or even 15 digits (fx-300ES).

The famous "Calculator Forensics" algorithm developed by Mike Sebastian evaluates on the three calculators for the arcsin(arccos(arctan(tan(cos(sin(9)))))) problem the following results:

The algorithm of the Casio fx-300ES are superior while the TI-30XS MultiView is rather disappointing.

Speed

Both the Sharp EL-W535 and TI-30XS MultiView outperform the Casio fx-300ES easily.

Result

3) Sharp EL-W535  Sharp entered the market of scientific calculators with graphical displays late but offers most bang for the buck. If you don’t need the N-base capabilities or the nice Math drill feature you should avoid the EL-W535 because of an awful keyboard and the glossy display bezel.

2) Casio fx-300ES  Casio introduced the Textbook Display and achieves indeed the best looking screen but the overall impression of the calculator is just average. If you used Casio calculators before, stay in the line.

1) Texas Instruments TI-30XS MultiView  No doubts - it is about quality not quantity. The competitors offer seven regression models, allow Base-5 calculations or have higher calculation precision, but the TI-30XS MultiView will survive the typical school days much better. The (x,y) table and List editor are very supportive in exploring daily math. If you need more, go for the TI-84 Plus!

Table: